
Image from ireland.com's "weather camera" vie blogspot.com
- Introduction with back-story
- March route security
- Delusional and confusing reactions and analyzes
Security, or the lack of, is something RTE have being touching on since yesterday; of the Irish blogs we’ve read had little or nothing...
Introduction with back-story
First, a half-decent introduction with back-story – another way many blogs have failed. The riot on Saturday in Dublin was a reaction to the “Love Ulster” protest. According to the organisers the “Love Ulster” demonstration was to protest and highlight over victims of the IRA, and celebrate ‘protestant culture’ (on the Last Word radio show last week, another protestants, who was opposed to the march, said such a culture was not common among all Irish protestants). The culture they spoke of is more likely a Unionist or Loyalist one, or even an Orange Order one.
The problem even the law-abiding opposition had with the “Love Ulster” protest was that it was the Orange Order using a victims group as a front in a provocative march. One of the main provocative parts talked about on the radio was that it started close to the offices of Sinn Féin; and it was too much for some that it would have passed the Garden of Remembrance, and the GPO using “Ireland’s main street”.
March route security
Dublin City Council “had no regrets” says RTE’s 6 O’clock news, apparently they done their best to secure O’Connell Street (ie nothing extra), and the police say they weren’t expecting so much hostility. The council and the police should be ashamed of them selves.
With out thinking about it too much, Blurred Keys was thinking the clash would happen closer to Parnell Square. The ill-secure building site that still is O’Connell Street was perfect for the thugs.
From the video footage, it looks like Dublin City Council did nothing new to secure the renovation works on the street. A mixture of the low and tall light fence-type barriers was a joke – both flimsy and possibly easy to knock over with just two adult males. Compare such the outer rings, the ‘steel rings’, of outdoor events, and the first two were hopeless. Transferring the building materials to one tighter protected point could have helped minimised the damage to the police and others, and the surrounding buildings.
Police planning was another farce. Saying they weren’t expecting so much hostility is bizarre. Many law-abiding and never-would-attend-a-protest type people were opposed to the “Love Ulster” march because of the Orange Order’s involvement. How exactly did they think dissident republicans and the associated thugs would react? A grouping that is considered enough of a threat to the state to be a main reason to continue the draconian Offences Against the State Act is somehow less likely then a bunch of Mayday protesters to start a violent riot.
Delusional and confusing reactions and analyzes
Disillusioned Lefty paints a rather delusional view that has the potential to misinform readers, “If not Sinn Féin itself, then its support base in the Republic is made-up of a bunch of nasty, drunken scumbags” the blog reads, some Flickr tags also list Sinn Féin. The view is ill informed – the crowd and more importantly those who acted in violent were, if the police can be trusted, mainly made up of dissident republicans, not merely republicans, namely those who would be linked to ‘Republican Sinn Féin’, not Sinn Féin.
Meanwhile, there’s been a complete over and confused reaction to the long term effects the riot will have on Dublin’s image worldwide – the rugby fans interviewed by RTE didn’t care, even a couple who were in a bar which was in the area said it’s not the worst place to be trapped in. Generally, people understand that riots are isolated events that normally don’t have poplar support. Or maybe, that’s wrong, maybe it will add to some people confusion that the north and the Republic are the same in terms of marchs and the surrounding violence? The image problem, if any, would really effect the north, adding to some peoples’ genuine fears and others list of excuses to stall the peace process.
If my experience away from the world of the internet was anything to go by, for the majority of the population, radio excelled (Today FM here, in Dublin a number of people online have said Newstalk done the same) while TV was lacking and slow in its reaction. Sky News had poor coverage, while Blurred Keys was on my late lunch sometime after the riot stated. They were going into long in-depth analyzes of the large bank robbery a few days ago in the UK, with little or no new info, while what was a breaking story, and what Sky is supposedly good at, was being ignored – guess the riot was a local story for the local people?
Blurred Keys thinks unprovoked attacks on anyone is easily wrong and condemnable, same goes any journalist, including Charlie Bird. The attack on him was disgraceful, but Bird’s reaction to the attack adds to the strange commentary. He said his attackers knew who he was, and he was surprised by the attack. How out of touch can one journalist be? Pkellypr.com calls Bird “Ireland’s figurehead journalist”, the fact is Bird can be seen as not just part of “establishment journalism” but also part of “the establishment” it self. How does he think thugs of dissident republicans would react to such a person? Maybe after an attack it is inappropriate to bring such disillusionment into commentary, but stating such is important. His comments rank alongside Marie Antoinette “If the people have no bread, let them eat cake” – so out of touch with a groups’ thinking and situation, although in this case as smaller group. I don’t agree with and can’t speak for the republicans, never mind about the dissidents, but commenting this much is needed when “the establishment” is so out of touch with them.
(One blog entry managing to attack the police, dissident republicans, Unionists, bloggers, and broadcast media – woops)
Recent Comments